RE: [iwar] RE: Cyberterror should be int'l crime?
From: David Alexander
To: 'iwar@egroups.com'
From: dalexander@triskele.co.uk
To: iwar@egroups.com
Tue, 14 Nov 2000 17:10:07 -0000
fc Tue Nov 14 09:11:14 2000
Received: from 207.222.214.225
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0)
for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:11:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by multi33.netcomi.com for fc
(with Netcom Interactive pop3d (v1.21.1 1998/05/07) Tue Nov 14 17:11:08 2000)
X-From_: dalexander@triskele.co.uk Tue Nov 14 11:10:35 2000
Received: from mk.egroups.com (mk.egroups.com [208.50.144.76]) by multi33.netcomi.com (8.8.5/8.7.4) with SMTP id LAA12864 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 11:10:33 -0600
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-752-974221830-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.53] by mk.egroups.com with NNFMP; 14 Nov 2000 17:10:36 -0000
X-Sender: dalexander@TRISKELE.co.uk
X-Apparently-To: iwar@egroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 14 Nov 2000 17:10:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 78908 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2000 17:10:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 14 Nov 2000 17:10:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mae.demon.co.uk) (158.152.59.189) by mta3 with SMTP; 14 Nov 2000 18:11:30 -0000
Received: by mae with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 17:10:08 -0000
Message-ID:
To: "'iwar@egroups.com'"
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
From: David Alexander
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list iwar@egroups.com; contact iwar-owner@egroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@egroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe:
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 17:10:07 -0000
Reply-To: iwar@egroups.com
Subject: RE: [iwar] RE: Cyberterror should be int'l crime?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I agree that the comparison was badly put, and not very apposite. However,
while not all hacking is the same as terrorism, some is, and more of it may
become so. The law needs to be in place to allow people to be prosecuted if
it is appropriate to do so.
We all know what a joke it has been trying to prosecute people for hacking
with the wholly inadequate laws that have existed to date within nations,
and across borders the situation is even worse. I think that laws are
required and required now.
just my 2c.
David Alexander
Project Manager & Information Security Consultant
Qualified BS7799 Lead Auditor
Triskele Ltd.
Office 01491 833280
Mobile 0780 308 3130
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Rosenberger [mailto:junkmail@kumite.com]
Sent: 14 November 2000 16:55
To: iwar mailing list
Subject: [iwar] RE: Cyberterror should be int'l crime?
>>Cyberterror Should Be Int'l Crime - Israeli Minister
Put yourself in the shoes of an Israeli or Palestinian whose son died in
street fighting. How would *you* feel if a bureaucrat compared your loss to
a
bad AOL connection?
Hacking isn't the same as terrorism, folks. Just ask any USS Cole sailor on
eternal patrol. 'Nuff said.
Rob Rosenberger, Vmyths.com editor
Truth about computer virus myths & hoaxes
http://www.Vmyths.com
eGroups Sponsor
------------------
http://all.net/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/5/_/595019/_/974221830/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
------------------
http://all.net/