RE: Antwort: [iwar] Officer Safety Alert Bulletin Officer needs a ssistance (fwd)
From: St. Clair, James
To: 'iwar@yahoogroups.com'
From: jstclair@vredenburg.com
To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Tue, 13 Feb 2001 05:04:19 -0800
fc Tue Feb 13 05:05:07 2001
Received: from 207.222.214.225
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0)
for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 13 Feb 2001 05:05:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by multi33.netcomi.com for fc
(with Netcom Interactive pop3d (v1.21.1 1998/05/07) Tue Feb 13 13:05:01 2001)
X-From_: jstclair@vredenburg.com Tue Feb 13 07:04:28 2001
Received: from hn.egroups.com (hn.egroups.com [208.50.99.199])
by multi33.netcomi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA12037
for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:04:26 -0600
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-934-982069471-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.52] by hn.egroups.com with NNFMP; 13 Feb 2001 13:04:31 -0000
X-Sender: JStClair@vredenburg.com
X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_3); 13 Feb 2001 13:04:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 92275 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2001 13:04:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 13 Feb 2001 13:04:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vre?sd?nt.vredenburg.com) (208.221.135.20) by mta3 with SMTP; 13 Feb 2001 14:05:34 -0000
Received: by vre-sd-nt.vredenburg.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <1MJ2HLM9>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 05:02:35 -0800
Message-ID:
To: "'iwar@yahoogroups.com'"
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
From: "St. Clair, James"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe:
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 05:04:19 -0800
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: Antwort: [iwar] Officer Safety Alert Bulletin Officer needs a ssistance (fwd)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I concur - I was not dismissive of discussion, rather I feel Fred's posts
are an effort to do just that. As such, I found what I felt was criticism
of his posts to be a little "over the top" intellectually. I would challenge
anyone who feels they know definitively whether something is "newsworthy" or
not for discussion here, barring the obvious right of the moderator to
restrict something.
I would encourage you Vernon (and others) to post your thoughts on anything.
It has been intellectual debate that has driven IW for years anyway.
'nuff said.
James
P.S. Nice web site, Vernon. ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: Vernon Stagg [mailto:vstagg@deakin.edu.au]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 7:45 PM
To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Antwort: [iwar] Officer Safety Alert Bulletin Officer needs
assistance (fwd)
I too was a little curious as to Fred's posting.
Although it was only on a small scale such a method
is an element of IW. Whilst not on a large scale as per
Markus' remark it does help raise issues, as per Fred's
reply. Indeed IW requires us to look at the "big picture"
and not be narrow-minded, as per Marc's post.
I find myself disagreeing with James - surely this group
is all about discussion, opinions included. I know
myself, and I'm sure quite a few others, are a little
hesitant at posting opinions but it certainly provides
a chance to learn and understand.
Discussion should be encouraged allowing those with
experience and knowledge to share that with others!
_____________________________________
Vernon Stagg B.Sc(Hons) - PhD Candidate
Department of Computing and Mathematics
Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria
Australia, 3217
email : vstagg@deakin.edu.au
web : http://deakin.infowar.com.au/~vstagg
_____________________________________
------------------
http://all.net/
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/1/_/595019/_/982069471/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
------------------
http://all.net/