RE: [iwar] China Virus

From: Rob Rosenberger (junkmail@barnowl.com)
Date: 2001-04-05 20:23:46


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1100-986527406-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 05 Apr 2001 20:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 12730 invoked by uid 510); 6 Apr 2001 03:23:54 -0000
Received: from ei.egroups.com (64.211.240.237) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2001 03:23:54 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1100-986527406-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.54] by ei.egroups.com with NNFMP; 06 Apr 2001 03:23:27 -0000
X-Sender: junkmail@barnowl.com
X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_1); 6 Apr 2001 03:23:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 23018 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2001 03:23:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 6 Apr 2001 03:23:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO barnowl.com) (206.72.12.109) by mta2 with SMTP; 6 Apr 2001 03:23:24 -0000
Received: from office01 (unknown [10.1.1.136]) by barnowl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 57930ED63 for <iwar@yahoogroups.com>; Thu,  5 Apr 2001 22:20:23 -0500 (CDT)
To: <iwar@yahoogroups.com>
Message-ID: <NDBBJBDJCGCKGDILPNNEIEDFGAAA.junkmail@barnowl.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <200104060241.TAA10979@all.net>
From: "Rob Rosenberger" <junkmail@barnowl.com>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:23:46 -0500
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [iwar] China Virus
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

ooooh!  An intriguing philosophical question.

I'd bet on the AV industry to blink first.  Two reasons: (1) China's not yet
addicted to antivirus updates, and (2) western marketers don't like to
alienate a large potential client.

Your thoughts?

Rob

-----Original Message-----
From:
sentto-279987-1098-986524916-junkmail=barnowl.com@returns.onelist.com
[mailto:sentto-279987-1098-986524916-junkmail=barnowl.com@returns.onelis
t.com]On Behalf Of Fred Cohen
Sent: Thursday, 5 April 2001 9:42 PM
To: Information Warfare Mailing List
Subject: [iwar] China Virus


OF course I figure the AV industry should just stop selling to China and
the matter will be settled...  Who would blink first?

FC


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Find software faster. Search more than 20,000
software solutions on KnowledgeStorm. Register
now and get started.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/1OWqsB/yMSCAA/7f4EAA/kzAVlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-06-30 21:44:06 PDT