Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1112-986716673-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 08 Apr 2001 00:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 23844 invoked by uid 510); 8 Apr 2001 06:58:59 -0000 Received: from ef.egroups.com (64.211.240.229) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2001 06:58:59 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1112-986716673-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.54] by ef.egroups.com with NNFMP; 08 Apr 2001 07:57:53 -0000 X-Sender: ozair_rasheed@geocities.com X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_1); 8 Apr 2001 07:57:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 36236 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2001 07:57:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 8 Apr 2001 07:57:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.isd.wol.net.pk) (208.242.129.253) by mta2 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2001 07:57:47 -0000 Received: from ozair (host-64-110-87-247.interpacket.net [64.110.87.247]) by mail.isd.wol.net.pk (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id MAA04722 for <iwar@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 12:50:08 +0500 (PKT) To: <iwar@yahoogroups.com> Message-ID: <MABBKMMMPGCGIIBCIGGHIEGLCJAA.ozair_rasheed@geocities.com> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <000401c0bf90$9620c620$3f76e2d1@home> From: "Ozair" <ozair_rasheed@geocities.com> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001 12:58:09 +0500 Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [iwar] RE: China virus Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit No offence meant and none taken. I take this list solely as a place of thought interchange. Regards, Ozair -----Original Message----- From: Glenn Williamson [mailto:Glenn_Williamson@ottawa.com] Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2001 11:29 PM To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [iwar] RE: China virus Importance: High TO ALL. Ozair/Rob/Fred and to all others. Ok, my opinion quickly came up when I read this, not knocking anyone by any means, but my opinion has nothing to do with the spy plane, if only I had so much time to read everything about the plane and everything that happened. If I was in my old profession, then I would know and care a great deal about the subject, but after 18 years in DND and caring a great deal about IWAR and various friends/foes in IWAR it came time to move on. I am still inherently intrigued and interested in IWAR but it now stems from other means, working in civilian life for a company all facets of IWAR mean a great deal, but (BUT!) from a completely different perspective. When I made a comment it has nothing to due to China and the potential problems that are ongoing but due to the subject of virus (anti-virus). Having worked for DND one of our main concerns was with anti-virus software and the deployment of. The fact that so many people create and expose viruses for the rest of us to ponder, one wonders about the companies that put the newest *dat files out, and the stories that surround them. Why is it when a new virus comes out it is extremely funny how quick each of the anti-virus companies, make a statement and come out with a new *dat file for protection. The moment the virus is released there is a new protection. (how is this working with the anti-virus companies), sometimes and I know if we check over the past 2 weeks, there is a company that rcv'd a copy of the new virus that interacts with (windows/linux) and they are stating it causes such damage. Funny thing about it is, that there had not been a single noted case in the wild of this worm (virus) infecting any computers through-out the world. Yet, the amount of stories written about this unique worm astound me. I think a lot of it relates to what one would imagine as profit margin, the quicker each company gets out the patch (*.dat) to deal with the problem, and tells everyone about it, the quicker there profits will go up. Okay, that was strictly my opinion and not of company I currently work for, we may be a partner to one of the above companies I just spoke about, but I am not in there profit margin so I figured I would comment on it, I apologize now to anyone who takes offence to this and now I will back in my dark corner and works on TCP/IP/UDP and crypto. -----Original Message----- From: Ozair [mailto:ozair_rasheed@geocities.com] Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 11:02 PM To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [iwar] RE: China virus After reading all the mail on this topic. I think that the opinions are voiced with such sentiments due to the recent Spy Plane case. And I believe that Mr. Rob has very strong negative sentiments against Chinese. Regards Ozair ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~> Do you have 128-bit SSL encryption server security? Get VeriSign's FREE Guide, "Securing Your Web Site for Business." Get it now! http://us.click.yahoo.com/EVNB7A/c.WCAA/bT0EAA/kzAVlB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------_-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-06-30 21:44:07 PDT