Re: [iwar] [tus] Re: China Blames U.S. for Yet Another Mid-Air Collision. (fwd)

From: c.g. treadwell (fastflyermach1@worldnet.att.net)
Date: 2001-05-09 12:39:48


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1222-989437226-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 09 May 2001 12:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7256 invoked by uid 510); 9 May 2001 18:42:33 -0000
Received: from hl.egroups.com (208.50.99.197) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 9 May 2001 18:42:33 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1222-989437226-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.55] by hl.egroups.com with NNFMP; 09 May 2001 19:40:27 -0000
X-Sender: fastflyermach1@worldnet.att.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 9 May 2001 19:40:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 69616 invoked from network); 9 May 2001 19:39:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 9 May 2001 19:39:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mtiwmhc24.worldnet.att.net) (204.127.131.49) by mta2 with SMTP; 9 May 2001 19:39:57 -0000
Received: from dhs96ndnozw22m ([12.78.120.91]) by mtiwmhc24.worldnet.att.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with SMTP id <20010509193955.NWRR1579.mtiwmhc24.worldnet.att.net@dhs96ndnozw22m> for <iwar@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 9 May 2001 19:39:55 +0000
Message-ID: <00ef01c0d8bf$cf827380$cf744e0c@dhs96ndnozw22m>
To: <iwar@yahoogroups.com>
References: <200105051339.GAA24936@all.net>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000
From: "c.g. treadwell" <fastflyermach1@worldnet.att.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 15:39:48 -0400
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [iwar] [tus] Re: China Blames U.S. for Yet Another Mid-Air Collision. (fwd)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks for the good guy commentary.  It is nice to know that I can even beat
Pike at his own game ever now and then
Best,
Beth
PS-send me Tom Johnson phone number-he keeps forgetting to leave it after
asking me to call.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred Cohen" <fc@all.net>
To: "Information Warfare Mailing List" <iwar@onelist.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 9:39 AM
Subject: [iwar] [tus] Re: China Blames U.S. for Yet Another Mid-Air
Collision. (fwd)


> [American humor - thought the list might like something light on the
weekend...]
>
> Date: Friday, May 4, 2001 8:23 am
> Subject: China Blames U.S. for Yet Another Mid-Air Collision. (fwd)
>
> BEIJING (Reuters) - Chinese officials have stated that they are
> holdingthe United States, "fully responsible" for today's mid-air
> collision,involving several Chinese aircraft and one American craft.
> This comes just weeks after a similar incident involving a U.  S.  spy
> plane.
>
> Officials have stated that at approximately 8:25 a.  m., GMT, a
> squadronof Chinese F-8 fighters collided with an American Goodyear
> Blimp.  The crash left over a dozen Chinese planes downed and the
> blimp's electronicbillboard damaged.  Sources say the billboard's
> scrolling marquee had been advertising the soft drink 7-UP, but after
> the collision, only thewords "Up yours" could be seen.
>
> A Chinese pilot who witnessed the collision between his squadron,
> nicknamed, "Panda Rash" told China's Xinhua news agency that he saw the
> American blimp dive out of the clouds and crash into wingman Sum
> YungGui's F-8 jet.
>
> "I told Yung Gui his tail was all broken.  'Keep it straight.  Keep it
> straight'", said the pilot.  "He just couldn't shake the American
> foreign- devil!" The blimp then reportedly veered hard left and then
> right, taking out the rest of the squadron.
>
> Pilot Chawp Suey told Xinhua the American blimp is "fully responsible
> for the incident", repeating the language Beijing has used in the
> earlier incident.
>
> China blames this new accident on the Goodyear blimp, saying it rammed
> the supersonic fighters, and has demanded an apology.
>
> Officials from the Goodyear Company have said it is unlikely that the
> slow propeller-driven blimp could turn inside and ram a dozen nimble
> fighters.
>
> "The direct cause of the collision was that the American blimp made a
> sudden big move toward the Chinese planes, making it impossible for the
> Chinese planes to get out of the way", Suey was quoted as saying.
>
> "The savage act of American blimps colliding with Chinese planes while
> conducting spying activities at sporting events makes us indignant", he
> was quoted as saying.
>
> ------------------
> http://all.net/
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-06-30 21:44:12 PDT