Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1365-993278135-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:36:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26978 invoked by uid 510); 23 Jun 2001 05:37:44 -0000 Received: from n2.groups.yahoo.com (HELO hi.egroups.com) (216.115.96.52) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 23 Jun 2001 05:37:44 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1365-993278135-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.53] by hi.egroups.com with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2001 06:35:35 -0000 X-Sender: fastflyer28@yahoo.com X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 23 Jun 2001 06:35:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 71254 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2001 06:35:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 23 Jun 2001 06:35:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web14502.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.224.65) by mta2 with SMTP; 23 Jun 2001 06:35:34 -0000 Message-ID: <20010623063534.4431.qmail@web14502.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.78.116.187] by web14502.mail.yahoo.com; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:35:34 PDT To: iwar@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <NDBBJBDJCGCKGDILPNNECELCGEAA.junkmail@barnowl.com> From: "c.b r" <fastflyer28@yahoo.com> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:35:34 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [iwar] Cyber-BUDGETs are the next battlefield Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Junk: Well, the Pentagon is getting a $15 Billion plus-up which amonts to milk money to DOD. That USATODAY story was a laugh. The color pix of uniformed personell all doing something "effeciently" amounts to nada in the big pix. If SecDef Rumsfeld understood what it meant to say IWAR was one of the most profound threats to national security, he would know that he talked it well, and then fell on his ass. Pentagon acquisition cycles being as slow as they are insures we will continue to work with yesterdays equipment and most likely some thrid rate people are working the IWAR problem, with a few noted exceptions like Fred Cohen and folks in this list. We are starting to see tip of the iceberg level attacks and I think it will require us having to get our collective asses kicked as a country before any significant changes occur to address this problem in a proper manner. It's the "tombstone" approach to spending. Sort of like the FAA. Given Jr. Bushes propensity to be fully unable to choose people to work for him, Chairman Hugh may be around for a bit until JR. remembers he is the commander in chief and has to make these decisions. Gee, another tough day at the White House-arg! Have a good weekend, junk --- JunkMail Rosenberger <junkmail@barnowl.com> wrote: > I gotta admit -- USA Today ran a gushing, naive, and > TIMELY front-page > infowar story. Writer Andrea Stone might end up > giving the Pentagon a > budget increase and a new JCS chairman. > > I won't bore everyone with a repeat of my full > diatribe. Read/listen to it > at http://Vmyths.com/rant.cfm?id=333&page=4 if > interested. > > Rob > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-06-30 21:44:18 PDT