Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1374-993561943-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 26 Jun 2001 06:26:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 15955 invoked by uid 510); 26 Jun 2001 12:27:24 -0000 Received: from jj.egroups.com (208.50.144.82) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 26 Jun 2001 12:27:24 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1374-993561943-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.54] by jj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 26 Jun 2001 13:25:43 -0000 X-Sender: fastflyer28@yahoo.com X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 26 Jun 2001 13:25:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 90665 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2001 13:25:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 26 Jun 2001 13:25:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web14507.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.224.70) by mta1 with SMTP; 26 Jun 2001 13:25:41 -0000 Message-ID: <20010626132529.13481.qmail@web14507.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.78.119.223] by web14507.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 06:25:29 PDT To: iwar@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <B30A25E2D1D2D1118021006097C3AC63C980EE@CCOPO> From: "c.b r" <fastflyer28@yahoo.com> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 06:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: [iwar] Figuring out the "quantity" of import that IWAR implies? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I agree folks-there are terms that have been used of late-hysteria, etc. that are a bit strong for the place that we are, today, with IWAR. Insidious, sure and difficult to deal with and several others, but we have yet to reach the point where IWAR has the potential to kill people on the order of nukes, however the problem is on the rise. The real question is where will it end up, once fully developed on the scale of weapony? Or will it always be a low intensity, unconventional type of fight?c.b.r of DC --- "St. Clair, James" <jstclair@vredenburg.com> wrote: > I think "attack" and "accusing" are a little strong. > As we have commented > here, criticism is not a bad thing. After all, it is > this list that helps to > de-bunk such cyber-hysteria anyway.... > > Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Ravi V Prasad [mailto:r_v_p@yahoo.com] > Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 6:22 AM > To: iwar@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [iwar] Me spreading hysteria about cyberwar > > > An article in vmyths.com by George Smith attacking > me and accusing me > of spreading hysteria about cyberwar. > > Ravi Visvesvaraya Prasad > > <snip> > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-06-30 21:44:18 PDT