Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1461-995958857-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 24 Jul 2001 00:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 16091 invoked by uid 510); 24 Jul 2001 06:16:55 -0000 Received: from n1.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.51) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 24 Jul 2001 06:16:55 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1461-995958857-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.56] by hh.egroups.com with NNFMP; 24 Jul 2001 07:14:17 -0000 X-Sender: ozair_rasheed@geocities.com X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 24 Jul 2001 07:14:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 17331 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2001 07:14:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 24 Jul 2001 07:14:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO radius.wol.net.pk) (208.242.128.11) by mta3 with SMTP; 24 Jul 2001 07:14:14 -0000 Received: from Ozair ([208.242.128.175]) by radius.wol.net.pk (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id PAA12300 for <iwar@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 15:04:43 +0500 (PKT) To: <iwar@yahoogroups.com> Message-ID: <002001c11410$39f9f7c0$6301a8c0@Ozair> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 In-Reply-To: <72222DC86846D411ABD300A0C9EB08A156FCB9@csoc-mail-box.csoconline.com> From: "Mohammad Ozair Rasheed" <ozair_rasheed@geocities.com> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 12:14:03 +0500 Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [iwar] news Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Is this an experiential learning or intelligent pre-event assessment :-) Regards, Ozair -----Original Message----- From: Leo, Ross [mailto:Ross.Leo@csoconline.com] Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 8:55 PM To: 'iwar@yahoogroups.com' Subject: RE: [iwar] news I must say that replacing Richard Clarke with a board of 21 might seem very flattering on the surface, but... Let's face facts: the CIAO has not been able to fully communicate their assigned gospel, and not all that many have responded as had been hoped for, either in resulting action or urgency. Not their fault either (for the most part) - empowered to actually do a job as opposed to merely being a voice of encouragement also helps. On the other hand, perhaps a new approach is needed, but not another board. I think America simply does a better job when responding to experiential learning, than it does by intelligent pre-event assessment, planning, and preparation. I have come to despise the use of the catchphrase "IT Pearl Harbour", but it may in fact come to that before those in economic and political power finally wake up to the real and active danger. Ross Leo Bush may replace cybersecurity chief with advisers President Bush is weighing a markedly different approach to protecting the nation's technology backbone from terrorism =97 one that would replace the high-profile security job his predecessor created with an advisory board of federal officials. The job currently held by national security expert Richard Clarke would be replaced with a board of about 21 officials from all major federal agencies, according to a draft executive order obtained by the Associated Press. The board would report to National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice. Among the agencies that would participate are the departments of State, Defense, Justice, Energy and Treasury, as well as the National Security Agency, CIA and FBI. http://www.usatoday.com/life/cyber/tech/2001-07-17-bush-cybersecurity.ht m [FC - thus moving it to a 'lower level' within the hierarchy. Most companies are moving it to a higher level.] U.S. Security Plan Too Top-Heavy? Critics fear proposed changes to the way the government protects the nation's technology backbone from terrorism could bog down the process and remove the accountability of having a single person in charge. A draft executive order from President Bush, obtained by The Associated Press, would abolish the high-profile post of security chief in favor of a board of about 21 officials from all major federal agencies. http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,45337,00.html ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-09-29 21:08:37 PDT