Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1486-996247824-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 27 Jul 2001 08:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 30773 invoked by uid 510); 27 Jul 2001 14:32:57 -0000 Received: from n6.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.56) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 27 Jul 2001 14:32:57 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1486-996247824-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.53] by hm.egroups.com with NNFMP; 27 Jul 2001 15:30:25 -0000 X-Sender: Markus.Spindler@ascom.ch X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 27 Jul 2001 15:30:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 56297 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2001 15:29:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 27 Jul 2001 15:29:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ascomax.hasler.ascom.ch) (139.79.135.1) by mta2 with SMTP; 27 Jul 2001 15:29:34 -0000 Received: from srvmailgate1.hasler.ascom.ch (srvmailgate1.hasler.ascom.ch [139.79.135.89]) by ascomax.hasler.ascom.ch (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f6RFTVP00660 for <iwar@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 17:29:31 +0200 (MEST) To: iwar@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.5 September 22, 2000 Message-ID: <OF7B5AF8E1.431EAB6B-ONC1256A96.0053BE0D@hasler.ascom.ch> X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on SrvMailGate1/Ascom(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at 27.07.2001 17:29:31, Serialize complete at 27.07.2001 17:29:31 X-Filter-Version: 1.2 (ascomax) From: "Markus Spindler" <Markus.Spindler@ascom.ch> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 17:31:54 +0200 Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [iwar] Chinese IW-one more thought Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fred, all, I feel the discussion is a little too depressiv here, so I'll share my 0.02£ of prozac: It is not always a good idea to be too far ahead of competitiors. That is why espionage has been tolerated by all the powerful nations in history to some extent (or make me believe that there was no inofficially sanctioned US support to the UssR's nuclear programs in the 50's). Sometimes this works out (get the UssR into an arms race & outperform and ruin them economically), sometimes not (German "Friedensbewegung", you could call it an anti-Pershing NGO cluster, succeeded; ironically, most of the staff was on the payroll of a diversity of German and Western agencies who individually tried to "keep somebody in there a) to control and manipulate them and b) because the communists have a guy in there". competition among agencies and lack of coordination were the key to the resulting defeat, sponsored by the tax-payer) I see the same pattern here. And I still do not see the US losing the game. So please, stop being so negativ ;-) Cheers, Markus [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Secure your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption! Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE Guide: "Securing Your Web Site for Business." Get it Now! http://www.verisign.com/cgi-bin/go.cgi?a=n094442340008000 http://us.click.yahoo.com/n7RbFC/zhwCAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-09-29 21:08:38 PDT