Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1553-996995564-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 05 Aug 2001 00:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 29902 invoked by uid 510); 5 Aug 2001 06:15:00 -0000 Received: from n2.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.52) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2001 06:15:00 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1553-996995564-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.54] by hi.egroups.com with NNFMP; 05 Aug 2001 07:12:44 -0000 X-Sender: fastflyer28@yahoo.com X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_2_0); 5 Aug 2001 07:12:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 50035 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2001 07:12:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 5 Aug 2001 07:12:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web14504.mail.yahoo.com) (216.136.224.67) by mta3 with SMTP; 5 Aug 2001 07:12:42 -0000 Message-ID: <20010805071242.16067.qmail@web14504.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.78.118.212] by web14504.mail.yahoo.com; Sun, 05 Aug 2001 00:12:42 PDT To: iwar@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <200108050351.UAA01258@big.all.net> From: "e.r." <fastflyer28@yahoo.com> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2001 00:12:42 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [iwar] Code red variants in increasing numbers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It sure is no where near dead. Is this a notice from the Party Congress that, "America,we have your number(IP).? I feel like a math teacher. You have concluded China, but no one has shown me their "work". Is this a break away faction in Taiwan throwing out disinformation. If I can use a computer with a .cn in its name, so can lots of folks. Russia has a serious interest in disrupting China's good relationship with N. Korea. All I have heard is it must be China. WHY? And why would they demonstrate no sense of OPSEC and not hit themselves on part of their infrasx they can afford loose for a bit? --- Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> wrote: > Looks like there are more Code Red variants on the way... One with > Xs, > in the overrun sequence, one with Os in the overrun sequence. They > seem > to be running at a higher rate and through cable modem and DSL IP > addresses for now. To get a sense, on random IP addresses, I am now > getting red code requests at a rate of one every few minutes - > sustained... > > This issue is not anywhere near dead yet as far as I can tell... > > FC > --This communication is confidential to the parties it is intended to > serve-- > Fred Cohen Fred Cohen & Associates.........tel/fax:925-454-0171 > fc@all.net The University of New Haven.....http://www.unhca.com/ > http://all.net/ Sandia National Laboratories....tel:925-294-2087 > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Small business owners... Tell us what you think! http://us.click.yahoo.com/vO1FAB/txzCAA/ySSFAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-09-29 21:08:39 PDT