Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1582-997453013-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 379 invoked by uid 510); 10 Aug 2001 13:18:59 -0000 Received: from n2.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.52) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 10 Aug 2001 13:18:59 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1582-997453013-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com Received: from [10.1.4.56] by hi.egroups.com with NNFMP; 10 Aug 2001 14:16:54 -0000 X-Sender: fc@big.all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 10 Aug 2001 14:16:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 93207 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2001 14:16:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 10 Aug 2001 14:16:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta2 with SMTP; 10 Aug 2001 14:16:21 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id HAA27386 for iwar@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:16:21 -0700 Message-Id: <200108101416.HAA27386@big.all.net> To: iwar@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <20010810081201.36201.qmail@web14504.mail.yahoo.com> from "e.r." at Aug 10, 2001 01:12:00 AM Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:16:21 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [iwar] Computer and Network Security vs. Information Privacy and Confidentiality (fwd) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Per the message sent by e.r.: > The Former DCI asked that for his personal security, that the CIA owned > computer used at home not be monitored. Which should have triggered the most severe monitoring they were capable of - or a simple 'no'. > When he left his post and the > machine was audited, porn sites and several other less than tidy things > came up on his machines-to include his wife's emails. For which he should have been arrested and jailed - or at least have his job and pension removed - as has been done to others who have done the same thing but been in less powerful positions. ... > While we may have all used government owned systems for sending emails, > or other personal matters, I have computers at home that I do personal emails on. In fact, one of the reasons I barely use the government computers I have access to is that I don;t want to break the rules. > finding the DCI's porno collection makes the > case that, unless dealing with classified material, a personal system > is the better part of both valor, and personal security. You better bet you're right on that one. Can we have the guy arrested and publicly prosected? After all, a Russiona who wrote a program to break a poor cryptosystem was arrested for breaking a law that is a lot less serious than misappropriation of government funds. FC --This communication is confidential to the parties it is intended to serve-- Fred Cohen Fred Cohen & Associates.........tel/fax:925-454-0171 fc@all.net The University of New Haven.....http://www.unhca.com/ http://all.net/ Sandia National Laboratories....tel:925-294-2087 ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Small business owners... Tell us what you think! http://us.click.yahoo.com/vO1FAB/txzCAA/ySSFAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-09-29 21:08:39 PDT