[iwar] [fc:Geeks.Gather.to.Back.Crypto]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-09-17 13:32:22


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1978-1000775358-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17042 invoked by uid 510); 18 Sep 2001 01:09:47 -0000
Received: from n25.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.75) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 18 Sep 2001 01:09:47 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1978-1000775358-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.54] by mv.egroups.com with NNFMP; 18 Sep 2001 01:09:18 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 18 Sep 2001 01:09:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 1241 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2001 20:32:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 17 Sep 2001 20:32:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta3 with SMTP; 17 Sep 2001 20:32:23 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id NAA16187 for iwar@onelist.com; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:32:23 -0700
Message-Id: <200109172032.NAA16187@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Geeks.Gather.to.Back.Crypto]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Geeks Gather to Back Crypto
By Declan McCullagh

2:00 a.m. Sep. 17, 2001 PDT

CATONSVILLE, Maryland -- Rob Carlson is worried about something that most
Americans would consider entirely obscure: the future of encryption
technology. 

Carlson, a 21-year-old programmer who typically sports a floppy, pin-studded
safari hat, fears that the U.S. Congress, in the wake of last week's bloody
attacks, may vote for anti-terrorism legislation that also threatens
privacy. "There's nothing as permanent as a temporary restriction," he says.

In an announcement distributed online Friday, Carlson suggested that
like-minded geeks gather at the University of Maryland's Baltimore campus on
Saturday and Sunday "in order to get the word out about the importance of
civil liberties" and prepare for the worst on Capitol Hill.

Long before the devastating attacks on the World Trade Center and the
Pentagon, the FBI and intelligence agencies warned that Osama bin Laden was
using impenetrable encryption to cloak his communications from American
eyes. If bin Laden, who has vowed to slaughter American civilians and is the
prime suspect in last week's hijackings, had used encryption, not even the
National Security Agency's beefiest supercomputers likely could penetrate
the codes. 

The mere possibility that the world's most-wanted terrorist may have used
encryption tools like Hushmail or Pretty Good Privacy has begun to spur
debate about how to ensure the U.S. government can listen in on them. Last
week, Sen. Judd Gregg (R-New Hampshire) called for backdoors in encryption
products, and a co-founder of the CertCo encryption company wrote an essay
on Saturday outlining how such a system could work.

That kind of news, coupled with a front-page Baltimore Sun article on Sunday
linking bin Laden to crypto cast a palpable pall over the pair of meetings
at the University of Maryland.

About 15 local geektavists did gather at the Albin O. Kuhn library on
Saturday afternoon to try to figure out how to persuade legislators and the
public that the liberties that Americans have long enjoyed should remain
protected during wartime. The participants' dilemma: how to argue for fewer
restrictions on freedoms without appearing unmoved by or insensitive to last
week's calamity. 

By the end of the meetings, the group, mostly system administrators and
open-source programmers, settled on a time-proven device of political
protest: a letter-writing campaign to Congress.

"With everything going on and everything moving so fast in Congress, we'll
only have a chance to provide them with information on one or two main
issues," says Carlson, a part-time student at the University of Maryland
who's a programmer at KCI Technologies in Hunt Valley, Maryland.

"We're probably going to have to focus on, 'Don't ban crypto, since crypto
facilitates e-commerce,'" he says. "If you do this, it's going to have
financial repercussions far beyond what you're thinking about."

Carlson plans to post details, including a draft don't-ban-crypto-letter, to
a newly created Working Group on Privacy and Civil Rights website.

Lending unexpected support to the group was Rep. Lynn Rivers (D-Michigan),
who showed up to pledge her support and offer some insider tips on how to
lobby their members of Congress.

Rivers said her colleagues in the House are most likely to heed phone calls,
followed by letters, faxes, and e-mail. She warned the group not to say
something like: "I have never voted for you, I'm not registered to vote, but
you've got to listen to me."

Last Thursday evening, the Senate approved the Combating Terrorism Act of
2001, which enhances police wiretap powers and permits law enforcement to
use the Carnivore surveillance device without a court order in some
situations. 

On Sunday, Attorney General John Ashcroft read reporters a statement at Camp
David, Maryland, that said he would ask Congress to go even further and
expand wiretap powers to give officers "enhanced authority" to fight
terrorism. 

"The mood on Capitol Hill is scary. It's a knee-jerk reaction," says Gabe
Rocha, a FreeBSD and Solaris system administrator who went to the meeting.

"Banning crypto's not the answer," Rocha says. "It doesn't solve anything.
It's like we're shooting at shadows now. It's totally useless."

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Do you need to encrypt all your online transactions? Secure corporate intranets? Authenticate your Web sites? Whatever
security your site needs, you'll find the perfect solution here!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/wOMkGD/Q56CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-09-29 21:08:44 PDT