[iwar] [fc:Network.warfare.making.progress]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2001-09-20 20:25:18


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-2130-1001042719-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 10534 invoked by uid 510); 21 Sep 2001 03:25:40 -0000
Received: from n26.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.76) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 21 Sep 2001 03:25:40 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-2130-1001042719-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.55] by fg.egroups.com with NNFMP; 21 Sep 2001 03:25:19 -0000
X-Sender: fc@big.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 21 Sep 2001 03:25:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 48027 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2001 03:25:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Sep 2001 03:25:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO big.all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta1 with SMTP; 21 Sep 2001 03:25:18 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by big.all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id UAA05942 for iwar@onelist.com; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:25:18 -0700
Message-Id: <200109210325.UAA05942@big.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Network.warfare.making.progress]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Network warfare making progress

BY George I. Seffers, FCW, 9/20/01
<a href="http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2001/0917/web-dod-09-19-01.asp">http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2001/0917/web-dod-09-19-01.asp>

Network-centric warfare promises to revolutionize U.S. military
operations on the battlefield, but the capability is not yet fully
developed, according to a Pentagon report on the subject.

Network-centric warfare "should not be misconstrued as a fully developed
and deployable warfighting capability. It is not," the report states.
"Far more needs to be done to develop, test and refine network-centric
concepts of operation and co-evolve them with doctrine, organization,
command approach, systems, and other components of a mission capability
package."

The report was delivered to Congress in July and publicized on the
Internet early this week. It sheds light on the military's
network-centric warfare capabilities-and shortfalls-just as the United
States gears up for military action in response to the terrorist attacks
on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon Sept. 11. 
Information technologies-especially those in the command, control,
communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance
domain-are expected to play an important role as the military tries to
hunt down an elusive enemy.

The report adds that "considerable effort will also be required to
develop network-centric capabilities that can effectively be employed in
allied and coalition operations" and noted that the capability holds
promise.

"The experiences with early efforts to explore network-centric
capabilities have been characterized by only a limited capability to
network the force and by applications of limited scope and scale," the
report states. "Despite this limitation, these efforts yielded promising
results. Deployment of a more fully mature network-centric capability
will transform the way in which wars are fought. The resulting impact on
the effectiveness of U.S. forces will justify the term 'revolutionary.'"

The tenets of network-centric warfare are as follows:

* A robustly networked force improves information sharing.

* Information sharing enhances quality of information and shared
situational awareness.

* Shared situational awareness enables collaboration and
self-synchronization, and enhances sustainability and speed of command.

* These, in turn, dramatically increase mission effectiveness.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get your FREE VeriSign guide to security solutions for your web site: encrypting transactions, securing intranets, and more!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XrFcOC/m5_CAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-09-29 21:08:46 PDT