[iwar] [fc:Systems.fail.to.deliver]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2002-01-14 09:10:02


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-4298-1011028142-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:11:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 18142 invoked by uid 510); 14 Jan 2002 17:09:13 -0000
Received: from n20.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.70) by all.net with SMTP; 14 Jan 2002 17:09:13 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-4298-1011028142-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [216.115.97.166] by n20.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Jan 2002 16:59:56 -0000
X-Sender: fc@red.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 14 Jan 2002 17:09:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 53649 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2002 17:08:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m12.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Jan 2002 17:08:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.72.98) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2002 17:08:59 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g0EHA2m30193 for iwar@onelist.com; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:10:02 -0800
Message-Id: <200201141710.g0EHA2m30193@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:10:02 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Systems.fail.to.deliver]
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Systems fail to deliver

By Diane Frank, Federal Computer Week, 1/14/2002  http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2002/0107/web-inqtel-01-11-02.asp

The digital Pearl Harbor the technology world fears already happened
Sept. 11, when information technology failed the intelligence community,
according to a CIA official.

Gilman Louie, president and chief executive officer of the CIA's venture
capital firm In-Q-Tel, said Jan. 9 at the Federal Convention on Emerging
Technology in Las Vegas that in a time of crisis, today's IT systems
fall short.

The IT systems in place at the CIA and at other agencies within the
intelligence community have made analysts less efficient, because they
spend valuable time searching for information stored in many different
locations, Louie said. The systems don't allow users to quickly find or
compare data especially if the search terms aren't exact. 
"We had an IT failure - all of the systems that we put together with the
best intentions weren't doing the job," he said. "We couldn't fuse the
data." 
This fact was made glaringly clear Sept. 11 when CIA employees at almost
every level ended up printing out stacks of paper and searching them
manually because it was faster than searching through data stored in IT
systems, he said.

Although there are many valuable new tools and products on the market,
what is most needed is a way to provide data to any authorized person
from any secure application or device at any time, Louie said.

The attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 was caused in part by the fact that
intelligence information was spread among many agencies that were unable
to put together the pieces to see the attack coming, Louie said.
Then-President Truman created the CIA to help gather all of that
information in one place.

Since then, the specialized IT systems put in place throughout the
intelligence community have remained separate, spreading the information
out so far that the threat of Sept. 11 so obvious in hindsight was again
obscured, Louie said.

In-Q-Tel's mission is to find and fund commercial technologies that
could help the agency's and the intelligence community's mission. It is
already considering many of the vendor proposals that came in after
Sept. 11, but more importantly there is now "an outstanding desire to
change" within the government, Louie said.

"We're at a unique time where it's obvious what the threats are, we have
suppliers of the technology willing to engage, and they want to do more
than donate blood, and we have agencies that are saying, 'We have the
need, we have the desire to change,' " he said. Advertisement

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2002-12-31 02:15:03 PST