Return-Path: <sentto-279987-4359-1011714008-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:43:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 10070 invoked by uid 510); 22 Jan 2002 15:40:12 -0000 Received: from n26.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.76) by all.net with SMTP; 22 Jan 2002 15:40:12 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-4359-1011714008-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [216.115.97.163] by n26.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jan 2002 15:28:43 -0000 X-Sender: fc@red.all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 22 Jan 2002 15:40:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 42359 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2002 15:40:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Jan 2002 15:40:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.72.98) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Jan 2002 15:40:07 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g0MFeX829508 for iwar@onelist.com; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:40:33 -0800 Message-Id: <200201221540.g0MFeX829508@red.all.net> To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List) Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 07:40:33 -0800 (PST) Subject: [iwar] [fc:U.S..Developing.Communication.Strategy.in.Anti-Terrorism.Campaign] Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <A HREF="http://cryptome.org/us-psywar.htm"Click here: U.S. Developing Communication Strategy in Anti-Terrorism Campaign</A <a href="http://cryptome.org/us-psywar.htm">http://cryptome.org/us-psywar.htm> US Department of State International Information Programs Washington File 18 January 2002 U.S. Developing Communication Strategy in Anti-Terrorism Campaign (Ross, others, address Brookings Institution forum) (1360)By Stuart GorinWashington File Staff WriterWashington -- The United States is developing a total communicationstrategy utilizing three essential themes to tell its story in theanti-terrorism campaign, says State Department official ChristopherRoss. The first is to represent the basic American values that unite thecountry, Ross said at a Brookings Institution forum on "<A HREF="http://cryptome.org/#propaganda">The Propaganda</A><A HREF="http://cryptome.org/#propaganda"War</A" January 16. He is a retired U.S. ambassador who serves as senioradviser to Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy CharlotteBeers."The second theme," Ross said, "is to present democratization andopenness as a vision for a better future, a future which does notrequire people to resort to terrorism."He said the third theme "hits at what we are coming to considerincreasingly to be perhaps the most important audience for our work --young people, those who are going to create the future, whose worldviews and mindsets are not yet fully formed." This theme focuses onthem through a look at educational systems and how they arestructured, Ross added.The plan will mobilize the resources of public diplomacy in allaspects both on the information side and on the educational andcultural exchange side, he said. Ross added that while crafting such astrategy, Beers is consulting within and outside the government andwill travel abroad to consult with U.S. embassies and local opinionleaders.Ross said he views public diplomacy as being "the public face oftraditional diplomacy." While traditional diplomacy seeks to advancethe interests of the United States through private discussions withforeign governments, he said, "Public diplomacy seeks to supporttraditional diplomacy by addressing non-governmental audiences" aswell, both mass and elite.Asked if "propaganda" is another name for public diplomacy, Ross said,"Much propaganda contains lies and does not shy away from them. Inpublic diplomacy, we don't deliberately look to state things that arenot true. We may couch them a certain way, but we deal with thetruth."Appearing on the symposium panel with Ross, Joseph Duffey, formerdirector of the U.S. Information Agency, which is now part of theState Department, said "propaganda is not that bad a word in French"and it used to be used in the United States "without the kind ofconnotation it now has."The issue now, Duffey said, is credibility. "You can't get away withlies very much. They damage your credibility," he said.Duffey added that public diplomacy is "an attempt to get over theheads or around the diplomats and official spokesmen of countries andsometimes around the press to speak directly to the public in othercountries and to provide an interpretation or explanation of U.S.values and policies."Thomas Dine, president of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, said thenegative view of propaganda is that it is methodological way of eitherbeing in favor of something or against it. "From a news andinformation point of view, you are trying to fulfill the firstresponsibility of our freedom - the freedom of speech, freedom of thepress," he said.Credible news organizations, Dine added, try to understand thedifference between important and non-important news, and thendisseminate it with the belief that "in a democracy, in a society ofpluralistic ideas and situations, that you will be informing people ofnews and information so that they can make decisions."Washington Post associate editor Karen DeYoung said that from a publicdiplomacy standpoint, the Bush administration has been doing very wellat home because people "are very much disposed to agree with them."Regarding communications overseas, she said the administration is notdoing very well, "not because they've been derelict somehow in puttingout information, but just because people are not disposed to believethis particular brand of information and they're getting otherinformation from other sources."Ross said that from his perspective, "As we try to address all ofthis, our first task is to make sure that our government's policiesare understood for what they are and not for what other people aresaying they are."One of the main accusations hurled at the United States in theaftermath of September 11, Ross said, "was that we were not reallyfighting terrorism, we were fighting Islam, and I think we've beenfairly successful over the weeks in countering that to the point whereno serious commentator at this point in the Arab world or the Muslimworld is harping on that theme. I think there's been acceptance of thenotion that the war was, in fact, against the al Qaeda organizationand against the Taliban regime that was harboring the al Qaeda inAfghanistan."Asked about the value of public diplomacy educational and culturalexchanges in the Middle East, where Ross served much of hisprofessional career, he said, "When you look at the number of peoplewho have been brought to this country to be exposed to Americanvalues, to return to their own country and take up positions ofleadership, I would posit that had that kind of activity not existed,attitudes in the Middle East would be even worse than they are today."Adding that while "the world is better for public diplomacy," he said,"The great dilemma is that there are very few concrete barometers,very few concrete ways to measure the effectiveness of any particularactivity."Still, Ross said, the effort continues. Regarding the educationalprogram, he said the United States wants to ensure that "the currentcampaign against terrorism, particularly in the Muslim and Arabcountries, evolves in a way that provides to young people the toolsneeded for modern life so they are not attracted to the apocalyptickind of vision that Osama bin Laden and others have proffered."Ross said the United States recognizes it is "an enormous task, butthe fact that it's enormous doesn't make it not worth pursuing."One of the problems in the Middle East, Ross said, is that "civilsociety as we know it here is very weak." He added that one of thetasks at hand is to encourage nongovernmental organizations to fillthe void between government and people in many of these countries andto create a different kind of political culture.Asked how the United States is responding to disinformation in thearea, Ross said it is through its press guidance operation."The world press is surveyed on themes that come out, whether they betrue or false. If they're of relevance to them and we feel we need toanswer them we will. And if something is an outright lie, we will sayso," he added. "Another part of it is to make oneself available formedia appearances in which these lies come out."Noting that acts of terrorism have been committed by followers ofvirtually every faith in the world, Ross said, "This is not uniquely aMuslim problem. But it is clear, and this goes back to the earlyhistory of Islam, that Islam is a religion open to many differentinterpretations."He said that "what has happened in the Osama bin Laden phenomenon isthat a group of extremists with a very precise agenda coming out of avery fundamentalist branch of modern Islam, have begun to s peak in thename of Islam as if that is Islam. The fact is that a vast majority ofMuslims do not identify with the kinds of positions that Osama binLaden and his Taliban protectors would take on how you live a goodMuslim life."There is work to be done to try to promote within the Muslimpopulation a discussion about what Islam is today, Ross said, but hestressed that while perhaps it is a discussion for the United Statesto encourage, "it is not a discussion for the U.S. government tolead."(A transcript of the Brookings forum is available on the institution'swebsite at www.brook.edu [see below] )(The Washington File is a product of the Office of InternationalInformation Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site:http://usinfo.state.gov)Source: <A HREF="http://www.brook.edu/comm/transcripts/20020116.htm" <a href="http://www.brook.edu/comm/transcripts/20020116.htm">http://www.brook.edu/comm/transcripts/20020116.htm> more go to: http://cryptome.org/us-psywar.htm ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Sponsored by VeriSign - The Value of Trust Pinpoint the right security solution for your company - FREE Guide from industry leader VeriSign gives you all the facts. http://us.click.yahoo.com/pCuuSA/WdiDAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2002-12-31 02:15:03 PST