[iwar] [fc:An.Orgy.Of.Defense.Spending]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2002-02-07 07:05:47
Next message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:U.S..Funds.Open.Source.Security.Hub]"
Previous message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [NewsBits] NewsBits - 02/06/02 (fwd)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-Id: <200202071505.g17F5mg20337@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 07:05:47 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [iwar] [fc:An.Orgy.Of.Defense.Spending]
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Los Angeles Times
February 5, 2002
An Orgy Of Defense Spending
Bush's 'axis of evil' rhetoric fabricates a need.
By Robert Scheer
Now we get to see just how cowardly the Democrats in Congress can be.
President Bush has proposed the most preposterous military buildup in human
history--annual spending of $451 billion by 2007--and nary a word of
criticism has been heard from the other side of the aisle. The president is
drunk with the popularity that his war on terrorism has brought, and those
sober Democrats and Republicans, who know better, are afraid to wrestle him
for the keys to the budget before he drives off a cliff.
The red ink that Bush wants us to bleed to line the pockets of the defense
industry, along with the tax cuts for the rich, will do more damage to our
country than any terrorist. The result will be an economically hobbled
United States, unable to solve its major domestic problems or support
meaningful foreign aid, its enormous wealth sacrificed at the altar of
military hardware that is largely without purpose.
Why the panic to throw billions more at the military when even the Pentagon
brass have told us it is not needed? Our military forces, much maligned as
inadequate by Bush during the election campaign, proved to be lacking in
nothing once the administration decided to stop playing footsie with the
Taliban and eliminate those monsters of our own creation. It was obviously
not a lack of hardware that made us vulnerable to the cruelty of Sept. 11
but rather a failure of will by President Clinton, and then Bush, to brand
the Taliban as terrorists and then to take out the well-marked camps of Al
Qaeda with the counterinsurgency machine we have been perfecting since the
Kennedy administration.
Clinton authorized the elimination of Osama bin Laden in 1998, but the spy
agencies simply failed to execute the order. Neither, apparently, were they
competent enough to track Al Qaeda agents from training camps in Afghanistan
to flight schools in Florida. All this even though these agencies possess
secret budgets of at least $70 billion a year, combined.
Despite the ability to read license plates from outer space and scan the
world's e-mail, our intelligence agencies lost the trail of terrorists who
easily found cover with lap dancers in strip joints.
The bottom line is that we need sharper agents, not more expensive
equipment. There is not an item in the Bush budget that will make us more
secure from the next terrorist attack.
That being obvious, Bush is now resorting to the tried and true "evil
empire" rhetorical strategy, grouping the disparate regimes of Iraq, Iran
and North Korea as an "axis of evil."
This alleged axis then becomes the rationale for a grossly expanded military
budget, the idea being that the United States must be prepared to fight a
conventional war on three fronts.
However, no such axis exists. North Korea is a tottering relic of a state
whose nuclear operation was about to be bought off under the skilled
leadership of the South Korean government when Bush jettisoned the deal.
Iraq and Iran have been implacable foes for 25 years, and both were despised
by the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
Meanwhile, a key Muslim ally of the United States, Saudi Arabia, produced 15
of the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers--and Bin Laden. Saudi Arabia is also where Al
Qaeda does its biggest fund-raising and yet, inexplicably, it is excluded
from the new enemies list.
Even if the accepted goal were the overthrow of the three brutal regimes
targeted by President Bush, that would hardly requirean expansion of a war
machine built to humble the Soviet Union in its prime.
Is Bush the younger now telling us that his father failed to topple Saddam
Hussein because he lacked sufficient firepower? The road to Baghdad was wide
open after we obliterated the vaunted Iraqi tank army in a matter of weeks.
Or does Bush the younger have even more grandiose plans in mind?
His astonishing budget makes sense only if we are planning to use our mighty
military in a pseudo-religious quest to create a super-dominant Pax
Americana.
Bizarre as that sounds, it may be the real framework for Bush's proposed
spending orgy. In any case, almost every non-American speaker at the World
Economic Forum in New York expressed fear at this specter.
Even our own Bill Gates was alarmed at the United States' apparent hubris:
"People who feel the world is tilted against them will spawn the kind of
hatred that is very dangerous for all of us."
Is it too much to ask that these billions, our billions, be spent to enhance
our security rather than further erode it?
Robert Scheer writes a syndicated column. 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Sponsored by VeriSign - The Value of Trust
When building an e-commerce site, you want to start with a
secure foundation. Learn how with VeriSign's FREE Guide.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/oCuuSA/XdiDAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Next message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:U.S..Funds.Open.Source.Security.Hub]"
Previous message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [NewsBits] NewsBits - 02/06/02 (fwd)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2002-12-31 02:15:03 PST