[iwar] [fc:New.York.presses."free-speech".lawsuit.against.Network.Associates]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2002-02-09 20:42:56
Next message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] SNMP Self-Test Tool Released (fwd)"
Previous message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:Don't.risk.it:.analyse.the.threat:..What.are.ther.real.securirt.risks.in.IT,.asks.Dave.Birch]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-Id: <200202100442.g1A4guo28267@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 20:42:56 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [iwar] [fc:New.York.presses."free-speech".lawsuit.against.Network.Associates]
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

New York presses "free-speech" lawsuit against Network Associates

By Ellen Messmer, Network World Fusion, 02/08/02
<a href="http://www.nwfusion.com/cgi-bin/mailto/x.cgi">http://www.nwfusion.com/cgi-bin/mailto/x.cgi>

The New York State attorney general has charged that Network Associates
is violating consumers' First Amendment right to free speech because
legal language pinned to most of the vendor's software diskettes demands
that no benchmarking or public reviews be done without Network
Associates' consent.

"It's wrong and should be stricken," said New York Attorney General
Eliot Spitzer in a press conference Thursday announcing the lawsuit in
which the state is demanding Network Associates renounce the wording or
face a court fight. Spitzer said his office has met with representatives
from Network Associates over the past few months to get them to change
the wording on the software diskettes to his satisfaction, but to no
avail.

"It's about censorship," said Spitzer, claiming the legal clause
constitutes an "unlawful practice" by Network Associates in that it
"precludes consumer comment of their products."

Spitzer added, "The concept that underlies what they've tried to do is
outrageous."

The offending language, associated with Network Associates' firewalls,
antivirus software and other security products in the past, specifically
says that customers "shall not disclose any benchmarking tests or
publish reviews of products without Network Associates' consent."

As evidence in the case, the attorney general's office is pointing to a
dispute that Network Associates had with Network World two years ago
over a firewall product review.

In an exchange of e-mail with the reviewer and Network World editors,
the software vendor challenged whether Network World had the right to
run the review of the product without violating Network Associates'
legal terms.

Network Associates didn't pursue that challenge, but it continued to
raise other questions about the findings in the product review. The
attorney general's office sought copies of the e-mail from the reviewer.
Network World is not party to the lawsuit brought by the New York State
attorney general against Network Associates.

"In November, we were contacted by the New York State attorney general's
office regarding Network Associates," said Network World Editorial
Director and President John Gallant. "The discussion centered on Network
Associates' reaction to a July '99 firewall review that ran in our
publication. We confirmed for the attorney general that Network
Associates has raised the issue of the license restriction on
publication of review results in an e-mail with our reviewer. The
company raised the issue after the review was published, and it did not
affect our publication or review process."

At the press conference, the attorney general said the Network World
e-mail messages are the only evidence to support its lawsuit that the
state will discuss publicly at this time.

Network Associates' behavior could have a "chilling effect" on public
reviews of software, Spitzer said.

Consumers Union, which publishes Consumer Reports, joined the press
conference to applaud the New York attorney general's lawsuit against
Network Associates.

"A private company should not be permitted to stifle the consumer point
of view," said Jim Guest, president of Consumers Union and publisher of
Consumer Reports.

Consumer Reports, which publishes software reviews of its own, has not
had disputes with software vendors that derive from licensing terms,
said spokeswoman Lynn Wagner. Consumer Reports has battled with other
companies, particularly automakers, over reviews they didn't like in
which Consumer Reports was sued on the basis of libel and
product-disparagement laws. Consumers Union views the lawsuit brought by
the attorney general as an important case for the rights of the media
and the public.

For its part, Network Associates does not view the case as particularly
strong on its "First Amendment" grounds.

According to Network Associates general counsel Kent Roberts, the
rationale for having legal wording about "benchmarking" and "consent" is
that Network Associates wants to ensure that reviewers are using the
most up-to-date version of the software which is subject to a product
review of any type.

"This language was designed to create a dialog with the customer," said
Roberts, noting that Network Associates "updates its products
frequently, and performance data for its products change."

The rationale behind the legal language is to make sure the product
reviewer possess the correct product for the test, Roberts said. Network
Associates has worked in the last few months to change the wording in an
effort to satisfy the New York State attorney general.

The new language, which is being added to diskettes, now states:
"Benchmark tests of former, outdated or inappropriate versions of
editions of the product may yield results that are not reflective of the
performance of the current version of the product." Software users
conducting benchmark tests of the product are asked "to contact Network
Associates to verify you possess the correct product for the test and
the current version and edition of the product."

But Spitzer said that so far his office has not seen anything to alter
its intent to press on with its lawsuit against Network Associates --
unless the company disavows in writing its previous practices.

"There's a deception in the way Network Associates communicates," said
an angry Spitzer, noting that Network Associates has told the state
office that the company doesn't seek to enforce its legal "consent"
language.

But unless Network Associates "disavows the purpose for the enforcement
of its pro-censorship clause," the state attorney general's office will
pursue the matter in court immediately, with Network Associates facing
possible financial penalties.

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Sponsored by VeriSign - The Value of Trust
When building an e-commerce site, you want to start with a
secure foundation. Learn how with VeriSign's FREE Guide.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/oCuuSA/XdiDAA/yigFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Next message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] SNMP Self-Test Tool Released (fwd)"
Previous message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:Don't.risk.it:.analyse.the.threat:..What.are.ther.real.securirt.risks.in.IT,.asks.Dave.Birch]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2002-12-31 02:15:03 PST