Return-Path: <kramert@mlrnoc.navy.mil> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 22 May 2002 07:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 29156 invoked by uid 510); 22 May 2002 14:36:00 -0000 Received: from mail.mlrnoc.navy.mil (138.139.52.8) by all.net with SMTP; 22 May 2002 14:36:00 -0000 Received: from intmgmtws1.mlrnoc.navy.mil (intmgmtws1.mlrnoc.navy.mil [138.139.52.9]) by mail.mlrnoc.navy.mil (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g4MEZOV21196 for <fc@all.net>; Wed, 22 May 2002 10:35:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [iwar] Some thoughts on the latest so-called scandal From: Tim Kramer <kramert@mlrnoc.navy.mil> To: fc@all.net In-Reply-To: <200205180234.g4I2YAZ20691@red.all.net> References: <200205180234.g4I2YAZ20691@red.all.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 22 May 2002 10:36:00 -0400 Message-Id: <1022078165.3039.85.camel@intmgmtws1.mlrnoc.navy.mil> On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 22:34, Fred Cohen wrote: > I find it interesting that in their effort to create controversy, the > media seems to miss the point - seemingly every time. The latest Bush > scandal is a prime example. Here's my take: Fred, There's one issue I haven't seen yet. The report that the media is referring to (according to the media) was an internal document that was part of a briefing/ update that GW requested and was held in Aug. My question is: how did the media get ahold of this document? If I remember correctly, Presidential briefings are classified. (Aren't they?) R/ Tim P.S. Since the conspriacy nuts' web sites (makes for entertaining reading on very slow days) have compared GW's silence to "Josphef Gobbels Nazi Ministry of Propaganda", I hereby invoke Godwin's Law and declare the whole "Did he know?" issue as moot.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2003-08-24 02:46:32 PDT