[iwar] [fc:European.'spying'.laws.savaged]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2002-05-31 15:42:42


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-4737-1022884809-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 31 May 2002 15:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 15715 invoked by uid 510); 31 May 2002 22:39:47 -0000
Received: from n23.grp.scd.yahoo.com (66.218.66.79) by all.net with SMTP; 31 May 2002 22:39:47 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-4737-1022884809-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [66.218.67.196] by n23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 May 2002 22:40:09 -0000
X-Sender: fc@red.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 31 May 2002 22:40:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 84659 invoked from network); 31 May 2002 22:40:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 31 May 2002 22:40:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.72.152) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 May 2002 22:40:09 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g4VMggn25237 for iwar@onelist.com; Fri, 31 May 2002 15:42:42 -0700
Message-Id: <200205312242.g4VMggn25237@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 15:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [iwar] [fc:European.'spying'.laws.savaged]
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=SUPERLONG_LINE,DIFFERENT_REPLY_TO version=2.20
X-Spam-Level: 

European 'spying' laws savaged
BBC

Net users could come under increasing scrutiny

Civil liberty groups have condemned a European Parliament decision to
let law enforcers spy on phone and net users. 

They also sharply criticised the parliament's decision to force phone
companies and net service providers to keep for years logs of what
customers are doing. 

The parliament said the measures were necessary following the 11
September attacks to safeguard national security. 

But some MPs said the decision handed too much power to the state at the
expense of individual privacy and liberty. 

Terror fight

The parliament voted to adopt the new data protection and privacy rules
on Thursday. 

Once adopted, national governments will be forced to draw up laws to put
the directive into practice. 

Before the vote, a coalition of 40 civil liberty groups issued a joint
statement warning that some of the proposed amendments could have
"disastrous consequences for the most sensitive and confidential types
of personal data". 


With today's vote the European Parliament supports the project of a
surveillance union

Ilka Schroeder, MEP One of the most contentious amendments called for
police forces to be given the power to make net service and phone
companies keep extensive logs of what their customers are doing. 

Some governments were calling for such powers, claiming that they would
prove useful in the fight against terrorism. 

Currently net service providers and telecommunications firms only keep
logs of customer activity while they generate bills.  Under the new
laws, the firms could be asked to keep information indefinitely. 

Civil liberty groups fear that police forces will be tempted to use the
collected information as a database they can trawl through for
suspicious activity - rather than acting on a case-by-case basis as they
do now. 

Policeman using video camera, PA Some fear state surveillance is growing
In the UK, civil liberty groups have warned that the controversial
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act already gives law enforcement
agencies sweeping powers to snoop on net users. 

The author of the bill, Italian independent Marco Cappato, criticised
the inclusion of the data retention amendment. 

"This amounts to a large amount of restriction on privacy and increases
the powers of the state," said Mr Cappato. 

Other MEPs were more scathing. 

"With today's vote the European Parliament supports the project of a
surveillance union," said Ilka Schroeder, MEP and shadow rapporteur of
the United European Left Group. 

She said not even the secret police of the former East Germany had
enjoyed the power to snoop that this directive gave to law enforcement
agencies. 

Spam stopped

The wide-ranging directive also contains new rules on the sending of
unsolicited commercial e-mail and the use of net-based data files or
"cookies". 

Now firms will only be able to send out e-mail adverts if people agree
in advance that they want to receive them.  The directive effectively
bans the use of sending of unsolicited e-mail or spam. 

Early drafts of the directive worried net advertisers because they
threatened to impose the same conditions on the use of internet cookies. 

Many websites use these small data files to identify repeat visitors,
maintain records of what someone wants to buy while they are at the site
and to tailor what visitors see. 

Angela Mills-Wade, spokeswoman for the Interactive Advertising Bureau,
welcomed the decision by the parliament on cookies. 

"They realised it was disproportionate to impose such stiff requirements
and it was much better to have something more practical," she said. 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Which security solution is right for your Web site? Before you
decide, request your FREE guide, "Securing Your Web Site For Business," to learn the facts. In the guide, find solutions for: * Encrypting online transactions * Securing corporate intranets * Authenticating your Web site Get your FREE guide today at:
http://us.click.yahoo.com/U02TTC/OyKEAA/sXBHAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2003-08-24 02:46:32 PDT