[iwar] [fc:Senator.(Burns).calls.for.U.S..control.of.ICANN]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2002-06-11 11:43:04
Next message: e.r.: "Re: [iwar] [fc:Snoops.a.go-go:.UK.gov.goes.mad.on.privacy.invasion]"
Previous message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:GAO.faults.Army.Corps.security]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-Id: <200206111843.g5BIh4J18782@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 11:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Senator.(Burns).calls.for.U.S..control.of.ICANN]
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Senator (Burns) calls for U.S. control of ICANN
Reuters
June 11, 2002, 5:10 AM PT


WASHINGTON--A U.S. senator said he would try to rein in the group that
oversees the Internet's traffic system, calling for a more direct U.S.
government role in the ostensibly international and independent body.

Sen. Conrad Burns, a Montana Republican, on Monday said he likely would
introduce a bill to require the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers, also known by its acronym ICANN, to give the U.S. government more
influence in managing the domain-name system. The system lets Internet users
navigate the Web with easy-to-remember names like "www.example.com."

If ICANN failed to cooperate, Burns said, it could be stripped of its
authority when its contract comes up for renewal this fall.

In a statement released two days before a Senate subcommittee is scheduled
to hold hearings on the global body, Burns said the change was necessary
because ICANN has exceeded its authority, does not operate in an open
fashion, and is dangerously unaccountable to Internet users, businesses and
other key interest groups.

"The U.S. needs to ensure ICANN operates with the same sort of internal
processes as in any other federal agency," he said.

ICANN is not a part of the U.S. government, but operates under a 1998
contract with the Department of Commerce that requires it to meet several
conditions before it assumes full control of the domain-name system.

But it is uncertain whether ICANN will ever meet those conditions and obtain
full control, according to a congressional investigator's prepared testimony
obtained by Reuters.

Criticism of ICANN comes from many quarters, not just U.S. politicians.
Dozens of other governments have charged ICANN with being too dominated by
U.S. interests, while the domain-name industry and grass-roots
"cybercitizens" have raised their own grievances.

Blame for security failures

ICANN has introduced competition into the domain-name business, driving down
Web-site registration prices from around $50 to $10, according to testimony
prepared by Peter Guerrero, a director of the General Accounting Office, the
investigative arm of Congress.

But it has made little progress toward fulfilling other requirements such as
boosting security of the domain-name system and setting up an inclusive
governance process, Guerrero said.

ICANN has made little progress in formalizing relationships with other
volunteer groups that oversee aspects of the domain-name system, he said.

"Until these issues are resolved, the timing and eventual outcome of the
transition effort remain highly uncertain, and ICANN's legitimacy and
effectiveness as the private-sector manager of the domain-name system remain
in question," Guerrero said in his written testimony.

Guerrero also took the Department of Commerce to task for what he called its
informal, hands-off approach to ICANN oversight, and recommended that
Commerce issue periodic progress reports.

ICANN President M. Stuart Lynn declined to comment on Burns' proposal,
saying he would wait until the bill was actually introduced.

"We respect Sen. Burns' interest in ICANN, and we'll have to see what
evolves," said Lynn, who is scheduled to testify on Wednesday before the
Senate science, technology and space subcommittee, on which Burns sits.

Lynn said Commerce exercises considerable oversight, noting that the group
cannot add new "top-level" domains to join the likes of ".com" without the
federal agency's approval.

A Commerce official declined to comment ahead of the hearing, when Assistant
Secretary Nancy Victory is also scheduled to testify.

ICANN has struggled over the past several years to figure out exactly how it
should function and who should participate. After direct elections open to
any Internet user filled five of 19 board seats, the board of directors in
March ruled out further elections.

An official reform committee released its blueprint last week, which will be
considered when ICANN next meets at the end of the month in Romania. 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Will You Find True Love?
Will You Meet the One?
Free Love Reading by phone!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Deo18C/zDLEAA/Ey.GAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Next message: e.r.: "Re: [iwar] [fc:Snoops.a.go-go:.UK.gov.goes.mad.on.privacy.invasion]"
Previous message: Fred Cohen: "[iwar] [fc:GAO.faults.Army.Corps.security]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2003-08-24 02:46:32 PDT