[iwar] [fc:UK.anti-terrorist.officials.alarmed.at.US.tactics]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2002-06-13 05:19:11


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-4823-1023970742-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 4670 invoked by uid 510); 13 Jun 2002 12:27:35 -0000
Received: from n19.grp.scd.yahoo.com (66.218.66.74) by all.net with SMTP; 13 Jun 2002 12:27:35 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-4823-1023970742-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [66.218.66.95] by n19.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jun 2002 12:19:03 -0000
X-Sender: fc@red.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 13 Jun 2002 12:19:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 85200 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2002 12:19:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Jun 2002 12:19:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.72.152) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Jun 2002 12:19:02 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g5DCJBY02648 for iwar@onelist.com; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:19:11 -0700
Message-Id: <200206131219.g5DCJBY02648@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [iwar] [fc:UK.anti-terrorist.officials.alarmed.at.US.tactics]
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=DIFFERENT_REPLY_TO version=2.20
X-Spam-Level: 

UK anti-terrorist officials alarmed at US tactics

Richard Norton-Taylor
Thursday June 13, 2002
The Guardian

Senior British officials responsible for countering al-Qaida terrorism are
becoming increasingly concerned about the Bush administration's handling of
the problem.

They say that imprecise or exaggerated warnings of attacks merely serve to
encourage panic, and give gratuitous propaganda victories to the terrorists.

One official described a blanket warning by Dick Cheney, the American
vice-president, last month about possible attacks on apartment blocks in the
US as being so vague as to be meaningless. Another British official put it
down to "back-covering".

There is also deep concern about the rhetoric employed by senior members of
the Bush administration, including Donald Rumsfeld, the defence secretary,
and John Ashcroft, the attorney general - and even Mr Bush himself. Some
suspects have been described as serious terrorists despite a lack of
evidence against them, with remarks which would be prejudicial to a fair
trial.

Mr Rumsfeld's description of prisoners at the US camp at Guantanamo Bay as
some of the worst al-Qaida terrorists, and pictures of the inmates given out
by the Pentagon, were described by Whitehall officials as "scandalous".

One official said: "American politicians are only concerned with American
audiences." Another described the rhetoric, and the US refusal to
acknowledge the Geneva convention, as "not benchmarks of a civilised
society".

Security sources are also critical of the way the Bush adminstration handled
the arrest of Jose Padilla, who according to US officials also uses the name
Abdullah al-Muhajir.

He was described by Mr Ashcroft as a "known terrorist" preparing to detonate
a "dirty bomb". There was briefly a suggestion from some, including Paul
Wolfowitz, the deputy defence secretary, that there had been an imminent
danger to thousands.

British officials say US security and intelligence agents are too quick to
believe those they interrogate. The authorities' attention appears to have
been drawn to Muhajir in particular by Abu Zubaydah, a former associate of
Osama bin Laden who is being held at a secret location in Pakistan.

Senior British officials also criticise the lack of evidence provided by the
FBI in its attempt to extradite suspects from the UK.

If American claims made about Lotfi Raissi, an Algerian pilot, were true,
one security source said, then he was "the most interesting person [wanted
by the US in connection with the September 11 attacks] by far". In April, Mr
Raissi was released by a British court which ruled that the charges against
him were unsubstantiated.

One security source warned about the danger of suspects becoming "victims of
a lynch mob" and said that it was "time for a good judiciary".

British officials also say the US is too quick to place blame elsewhere, for
example over anthrax attacks which are now assumed to have originated in the
US. "Dirty bombs" are considered more likely to be made with radioactive
material stolen in the US than smuggled from abroad. 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Will You Find True Love?
Will You Meet the One?
Free Love Reading by phone!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Deo18C/zDLEAA/Ey.GAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2003-08-24 02:46:32 PDT