Return-Path: <sentto-279987-4888-1024977059-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 24 Jun 2002 20:54:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 11169 invoked by uid 510); 25 Jun 2002 03:50:52 -0000 Received: from n19.grp.scd.yahoo.com (66.218.66.74) by all.net with SMTP; 25 Jun 2002 03:50:52 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-4888-1024977059-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.197] by n19.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Jun 2002 03:50:59 -0000 X-Sender: fc@red.all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 25 Jun 2002 03:50:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 11050 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2002 03:50:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Jun 2002 03:50:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.72.152) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Jun 2002 03:50:59 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g5P3q3c20192 for iwar@onelist.com; Mon, 24 Jun 2002 20:52:03 -0700 Message-Id: <200206250352.g5P3q3c20192@red.all.net> To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List) Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 20:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [iwar] [fc:Study:.Security.Worries.Holding.Back.Web.Services] Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=5.0 tests=RISK_FREE,FREE_MONEY,DIFFERENT_REPLY_TO version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: *** Study: Security Worries Holding Back Web Services <a href="http://www.internetwk.com/webDev/INW20020620S0007">http://www.internetwk.com/webDev/INW20020620S0007> By Richard Karpinski Immature and at-times overlapping security standards and technologies have left enterprises confused about how to secure emerging Web services architectures, according to a study released Thursday from ZapThink LLC. The analyst group, which focuses on XML issues, cited concerns about security as the major roadblock on the path to Web services adoption. ZapThink outlined a growing Web services security industry —which it said would grow from $40 million in 2001 to more than $4.4 billion in 2006—designed to address such concerns. Web services security is perhaps most challenging because it touches so many disciplines, from encryption to access management and beyond, said Jason Bloomberg, ZapThink senior analyst. "You can't just buy a little security" when it comes to Web services, he said. ZapThink predicted interest in this area would spike in the next 12 months and identified 12 separate industry segments contributing to Web services security. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Free $5 Love Reading Risk Free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2003-08-24 02:46:33 PDT