[iwar] [fc:Ex-General:.War.Game.Rigged]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2002-08-19 06:13:35


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-5210-1029762745-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 19 Aug 2002 06:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 22871 invoked by uid 510); 19 Aug 2002 13:10:49 -0000
Received: from n10.grp.scd.yahoo.com (66.218.66.65) by all.net with SMTP; 19 Aug 2002 13:10:49 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-5210-1029762745-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [66.218.66.95] by n10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Aug 2002 13:12:25 -0000
X-Sender: fc@red.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 19 Aug 2002 13:12:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 84366 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2002 13:12:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 19 Aug 2002 13:12:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.72.152) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Aug 2002 13:12:24 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g7JDDZr08127 for iwar@onelist.com; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 06:13:35 -0700
Message-Id: <200208191313.g7JDDZr08127@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 06:13:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Ex-General:.War.Game.Rigged]
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=DIFFERENT_REPLY_TO version=2.20
X-Spam-Level: 

washingtonpost.com 
Ex-General: War Game Rigged

By Associated Press
Associated Press
Saturday, August 17, 2002 

A retired general who commanded "enemy" forces in a recently concluded $250
million U.S. war game says the exercise was rigged so that it appeared to
validate new war-fighting concepts it was supposed to test.

Paul Van Riper, who headed the Marine Corps Combat Development Command when
he retired in 1997 as a three-star general, said he became so frustrated
with undue constraints on his command of "enemy" forces that he quit the
role midway through Millennium Challenge 2002, which ended Aug. 15.

His complaints were reported yesterday by the Army Times, a private
newspaper that covers Army issues. The Times obtained a copy of an e-mail
Van Riper sent to colleagues explaining why he had quit.

"It was in actuality an exercise that was almost entirely scripted to ensure
a Blue [friendly forces] 'win,' " he wrote. Van Riper was in command of the
Red force, meant to simulate the enemy.

Navy Capt. John Carman, chief spokesman at Joint Forces Command in Norfolk,
which sponsored the war game, said there is no record of Van Riper having
quit his role as "enemy" commander. He said the retired general is "held in
high regard" and is entitled to his opinions.

"We don't agree with his conclusions," Carman said.

Van Riper, who participated as a contract employee, said he was concerned
that the military would implement new war-fighting concepts on the basis of
what he considers to be false conclusions from the three-week exercise.

Carman said that the results of the war game were being evaluated and that
some concepts will require further experimentation.

Millennium Challenge 2002 involved a wide range of U.S. military commands
across the country linked by computer networks to simulated troops, air and
sea units with 13,500 military personnel fighting a classified war scenario.

Van Riper said exercise officials denied him the opportunity to use his own
tactics and ideas against the Blue forces. He added that on several
occasions the Red forces were directed not to use certain weapons against
Blue.

Robert Oakley, a retired ambassador who played the role of civilian leader
of the Red force, told the Times that Van Riper was outthinking the Blue
force. He said, for example, that in the computer simulations, Van Riper
used motorcycle messengers to transmit orders, negating the Blue forces'
high-tech eavesdropping capabilities. When the Blue naval forces sailed into
the Persian Gulf early in the experiment, Van Riper's forces surrounded the
ships with small boats and planes.

Much of the Blue force's ships ended up at the bottom of the ocean. Oakley
said Joint Forces Command officials had to stop the exercise and "refloat"
the fleet in order to continue.

Vice Adm. Marty Mayer, deputy commander of Joint Forces Command, defended
the exercise.

"I want to disabuse anybody of any notion that somehow the books were
cooked," Mayer told the Times. But he said "certain things are scripted" in
any large war game. "You have to execute in a certain way or you'll never be
able to bring it all together," he said.

Mayer said that in some parts of the exercise Van Riper was constrained "in
order to facilitate the conduct of the experiment."

© 2002 The Washington Post Company

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now
http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/Ey.GAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2002-10-01 06:44:32 PDT