Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: [iwar] interesting pointer
From: Fred Cohen
From: fc@all.net
To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:01:29 -0800 (PST)
fc Tue Mar 6 08:04:33 2001
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0)
for fc@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 06 Mar 2001 08:04:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 9251 invoked by uid 510); 6 Mar 2001 16:00:25 -0000
Received: from fk.egroups.com (64.211.240.232)
by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2001 16:00:25 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1010-983894498-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.54] by fk.egroups.com with NNFMP; 06 Mar 2001 16:01:38 -0000
X-Sender: fc@all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 6 Mar 2001 16:01:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 4477 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2001 16:01:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 6 Mar 2001 16:01:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO all.net) (65.0.156.78) by mta3 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2001 17:02:34 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by all.net (8.9.3/8.7.3) id IAA21954 for iwar@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:01:29 -0800
Message-Id: <200103061601.IAA21954@all.net>
To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
In-Reply-To: from "Markus Spindler" at Mar 06, 2001 03:30:26 PM
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
From: Fred Cohen
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe:
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:01:29 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: [iwar] interesting pointer
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Per the message sent by Markus Spindler:
> Did the involved parties do their homework?
> What do (or should) they want to achieve, and do they succeed?
> Obviously, right now the Japanese handle the situation much
> to their advantage. Has anybody a guess on the next moves
> of the Navy? Of the Japanese?
I kind of thought the submarine might have popped up intentionally to
make it clear to the Japanes that this is not considered acceptable
behavior. I see you...
So they stiff the captain and pay some $s (the cost of a normal boat -
not the cost of an intelligence gathering vessel) and pulicly
appologize. It's nothing compared to the impact on the Japanese and
others on trying to be stealthy and follow US submarines. In the back
channel, they explain that the next time the ship will simply disappear
without explanation.
Even if the whole thing was a mistake by the sub captain, they can still
play like it wasn't - to the same effect.
Other views solicited...
FC
--
Fred Cohen at Sandia National Laboratories at tel:925-294-2087 fax:925-294-1225
Fred Cohen & Associates: http://all.net - fc@all.net - tel/fax:925-454-0171
Fred Cohen - Practitioner in Residence - The University of New Haven
This communication is confidential to the parties it is intended to serve.
PGP keys: https://all.net/pgpkeys.html - Have a great day!!!
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Find software faster. Search more than 20,000
software solutions on KnowledgeStorm. Register
now and get started.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ncHzAA/yMSCAA/7f4EAA/kzAVlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
------------------
http://all.net/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/