[iwar] Re: Why do you track Code Red attempts?

From: ellisd@cs.ucsb.edu
Date: 2001-08-09 08:18:03


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-1573-997370300-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.1.0) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 09 Aug 2001 08:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 25782 invoked by uid 510); 9 Aug 2001 14:20:28 -0000
Received: from n25.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.75) by 204.181.12.215 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2001 14:20:28 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-1573-997370300-fc=all.net@returns.onelist.com
Received: from [10.1.4.52] by mv.egroups.com with NNFMP; 09 Aug 2001 15:18:20 -0000
X-Sender: ellisd@cs.ucsb.edu
X-Apparently-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 9 Aug 2001 15:18:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 7041 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2001 15:18:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 9 Aug 2001 15:18:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n7.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.10.46) by mta1 with SMTP; 9 Aug 2001 15:18:09 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: ellisd@cs.ucsb.edu
Received: from [10.1.10.65] by fj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 09 Aug 2001 15:18:04 -0000
To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: <9ku9jb+td0a@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010809031117.59191.qmail@web14509.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 128.29.4.1
From: ellisd@cs.ucsb.edu
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 15:18:03 -0000
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [iwar] Re: Why do you track Code Red attempts?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--- In iwar@y..., "e.r." <fastflyer28@y...> wrote:
> Did perhaps the thought that people were trying to understand  the 
"why
> and who behind Code Red ever dawn on you?  That will find you far 
more
> than just looking at the Code.  The answers are only there, in part. 
As
> who and why now-then you will start to understand the problem far
> better,

[snip]

Do you think you can figure out the "who" and "why" from these 
numbers?  I don't.  I simple miscalculation in the design or 
implementation (especially) would create unexpected behavior making 
your deductions misguided.  The Morris Worm, for example, had a bug in 
it that caused the worm to reinfect the machine repeatedly.  The 
design included a mechanism to prevent reinfection--but it was buggy 
and failed to prevent reinfection.

I think looking at the source code (if you can find it) will give you 
far more clues about the "who" and "why" than the actual behavior.  
Unfortunately, we will probably only get our hands on 
reverse-engineered code which has a lot of the tell-tale 
characteristics removed.  It is true that looking at source code does 
not answer your questions entirely, but it will probably be more 
reliable information than the behavior of the worm.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Small business owners...
Tell us what you think!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/vO1FAB/txzCAA/ySSFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2001-09-29 21:08:39 PDT