Return-Path: <sentto-279987-4173-1009983225-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com> Delivered-To: fc@all.net Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 02 Jan 2002 06:55:08 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 22770 invoked by uid 510); 2 Jan 2002 14:54:08 -0000 Received: from n23.groups.yahoo.com (216.115.96.73) by all.net with SMTP; 2 Jan 2002 14:54:08 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-4173-1009983225-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [216.115.97.164] by n23.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jan 2002 14:53:47 -0000 X-Sender: fc@red.all.net X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 2 Jan 2002 14:53:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 66890 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2002 14:53:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m10.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Jan 2002 14:53:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.125.69) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Jan 2002 14:53:45 -0000 Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g02Erou04870 for iwar@onelist.com; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 06:53:50 -0800 Message-Id: <200201021453.g02Erou04870@red.all.net> To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List) Organization: I'm not allowed to say X-Mailer: don't even ask X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net> X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 06:53:50 -0800 (PST) Subject: [iwar] [fc:When.Betrayal.And.Paranoia.Are.Part.Of.The.Job] Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit New York Times January 2, 2002 When Betrayal And Paranoia Are Part Of The Job By Tom Mangold LONDON -- A vintage spy joke: The counterintelligence officer looks in the mirror while shaving and asks, I wonder who that man is working for? Counterintelligence, the black art of preventing other people from stealing your secrets, was Robert Hanssen's job at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Now, as he sits in his cell in a federal jail quietly confessing his monstrous thefts of America's most secret secrets, attention turns again to the psychological profiling of counterintelligence officers. These are supposed to be the most trusted men and women of the intelligence world, the spies who must know all the secrets so they can protect them. Mr. Hanssen was one of the F.B.I.'s top counterintelligence officers. He was a tall, slightly overweight, boring individual who lacked basic social graces. Yet he has turned out to be a clutch of paradoxes. He adored his wife and children but spent his spare time with a stripper; he was a devout Catholic, yet used his priest confessors as a moral shield to continue spying; he hated Communism but betrayed his country rotten. You can almost hear Kim Philby, the British spy and archtraitor of the West, chuckling in his grave. Mr. Hanssen admired him. Of course. The truth is, those whom the gods favor in the world of counterintelligence, they first drive mad. It is a ghastly job. Imagine being told to assume that your boss is stealing from your company. Imagine endless months of painstaking detective work to unravel just one possible clue in an investigation that may run for a decade at least. Imagine that even when you get home and put your feet up and take that first sip of whiskey, all you can talk about is the weather. One positive result of the Hanssen case may be the establishment within the F.B.I. of annual psychological tests for the unfortunates who work in the febrile world of counterintelligence. Like military officers who have access to the nuclear trigger, F.B.I. officers may in the future be scrutinized for signs of incipient paranoia or lesser forms of mental distress. Such afflictions are occasioned mainly, I believe, by the sheer loneliness of keeping secrets. Mr. Hanssen is often portrayed as some Hieronymus Bosch sinner falling headlong into the flames of perdition. It may be a convenient way of explaining the enormity of his treachery, but I remain skeptical. I think Mr. Hanssen thought he was a darned clever operator (he was right) and he simply wanted peer approval. That would explain many of the apparent paradoxes. Why consort, as he did, with a humble stripper? Not for sex; he never touched the gallant Priscilla Galey, she has told interviewers. More likely he wanted her to know that he was a good F.B.I. officer. A former senior F.B.I. officer who worked with Mr. Hanssen told me the confessed spy "was a sort of nerdy guy - he didn't fit into our canteen culture." Perhaps he became a double agent to indulge in the luxury of letting someone outside the bureau realize how smart he was. Read his correspondence with his Soviet and Russian masters, and the clues bite you in the leg. The exchange of letters shows a desperate Robert Hanssen seeking approval from the one group that fully understood how good an operator he was: the opposition. The Russians certainly knew how to appreciate his skills - and they played him like a harp. When he sent one valuable load of secrets to them, they wrote back: "We acknowledge your superb sense of humor and sharp-as-a-razor mind. We highly appreciate both." Here was the acknowledgment he must have craved. Mr. Hanssen's response to another message reveals the extent of his estrangement, and of his self-conceit: "The U.S. can be regarded as a powerfully built but retarded child, potentially dangerous but young, immature and easily manipulated." How significant that the only people he could boast to were pledged to secrecy - his priests (to whom he regularly confessed about spying) and his Russian contacts. Surely Mr. Hanssen wanted the money he was paid (although he gave much of it away, to Ms. Galey and to Catholic charities), and possibly he was psychologically unstable (and so said a psychiatrist retained - and later fired - by his defense lawyers). But the explanation for his actions may be much simpler. In the twilight world of counterintelligence, where your closest colleague may be your next target, navigating the dark terrain of conflicted loyalties has tested greater minds than Mr. Hanssen's. The legendary head of counterintelligence for the Central Intelligence Agency, James Jesus Angleton, was driven half insane by the job. For 20 years he held the same position, and at the height of the cold war his paranoid obsessions led him into one of the most shameful acts in the history of American intelligence. In 1964 a young K.G.B. officer named Yuri Nosenko defected to the United States, but Mr. Angleton concluded he was a double agent dispatched by the K.G.B. When Mr. Nosenko denied this charge, Mr. Angleton had him arrested and thrown into solitary confinement - without ever charging him with any crime. He was imprisoned for more than three years - two of them in a special concrete cell built for him on C.I.A. property. During this time, his only reading material was a label from a tube of toothpaste. Mr. Angleton became so obsessed with his counterintelligence work that he violated the principles of the Constitution he had sworn to uphold. Mr. Nosenko was later vindicated and rehabilitated. Mr. Angleton's legacy remains controversial. None of these painful events would have occurred if counterintelligence agents were allowed to breathe the same air and drink the same water as the rest of us. Counterintelligence officers should be rotated out of the discipline at least every two years. They should be encouraged to spend as much time as possible in the real world to counterbalance time spent in their closed offices. Mr. Angleton's successor as chief of counterintelligence, George Kalaris, stepped down after only two anxious years. We cannot assume that traitors have defective genes or have been infected by some alien madness to which ordinary mortals are immune. We must recognize that counterintelligence itself thrives on hot-house secrecy, engendering a kind of loneliness that breeds irrationality and moral confusion. Robert Hanssen, like James Angleton, is as much a victim of this paranoid system as a cause of it. His punishment for more than 20 years of spying on his country is life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, and most would agree it is deserved. Equally necessary is the reform of a system that allows such men to flourish. Tom Mangold is a BBC-TV correspondent and author of "Cold Warrior: James Jesus Angleton, The C.I.A.'s Master Spy Hunter." ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Free unlimited PC-PC calling at CrystalVoice! Just $11.95/yr. Download your free 30 day trial. Click Here! http://us.click.yahoo.com/5SQRwC/QYfDAA/ySSFAA/kgFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ------------------ http://all.net/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2002-12-31 02:15:02 PST