[iwar] [fc:Pentagon.Battles.Waning.Morale]

From: Fred Cohen (fc@all.net)
Date: 2002-08-12 20:40:41


Return-Path: <sentto-279987-5169-1029210135-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: fc@all.net
Received: from 204.181.12.215 [204.181.12.215] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.7.4) for fc@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 12 Aug 2002 21:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 1470 invoked by uid 510); 13 Aug 2002 03:40:50 -0000
Received: from n40.grp.scd.yahoo.com (66.218.66.108) by all.net with SMTP; 13 Aug 2002 03:40:50 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: sentto-279987-5169-1029210135-fc=all.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com
Received: from [66.218.67.199] by n40.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Aug 2002 03:42:15 -0000
X-Sender: fc@red.all.net
X-Apparently-To: iwar@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 13 Aug 2002 03:42:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 9616 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2002 03:42:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Aug 2002 03:42:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO red.all.net) (12.232.72.152) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Aug 2002 03:40:01 -0000
Received: (from fc@localhost) by red.all.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g7D3efU20835 for iwar@onelist.com; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:40:41 -0700
Message-Id: <200208130340.g7D3efU20835@red.all.net>
To: iwar@onelist.com (Information Warfare Mailing List)
Organization: I'm not allowed to say
X-Mailer: don't even ask
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
From: Fred Cohen <fc@all.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: fcallnet
Mailing-List: list iwar@yahoogroups.com; contact iwar-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list iwar@yahoogroups.com
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:iwar-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [iwar] [fc:Pentagon.Battles.Waning.Morale]
Reply-To: iwar@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=WORK_AT_HOME,DIFFERENT_REPLY_TO version=2.20
X-Spam-Level: 

Washington Times
August 12, 2002
Pentagon Battles Waning Morale 
By Rowan Scarborough, The Washington Times
Morale has collapsed at the Pentagon division that churns out pivotal policy
papers to run the war on terrorism, Defense Department employees say.
They say morale reached such a low point that Douglas J. Feith,
undersecretary of defense for policy and a major player in war strategy,
collected about two dozen of his top managers and ordered them to the
Virginia countryside to hash out differences.
During the Aug. 2-3 "off-site," as the government calls such meetings, Mr.
Feith listened to gripes about the way the expansive policy apparatus is
run. Some complained of extra-long workdays, little feedback on their
efforts, Mr. Feith's management style and a stream of white papers (dubbed
"snowflakes") from Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's sharp pen that
must be answered swiftly.
"One woman stood up and told him this was the worst she had seen things in
15 years," said a Pentagon employee who was later briefed on the off-site,
held at Airlie House, a conference center in Warrenton, an hour's drive from
the Pentagon. "Feith mostly sat and listened."
Mr. Feith is reported to have said that the 10-month-old war on terrorism
has thrust a heavy workload on everyone. He assured them Mr. Rumsfeld, a
demanding boss, likes the policy arm's products.
One employee reportedly replied, "The reason morale is so low is your people
haven't conveyed that message."
In an interview with The Washington Times, Mr. Feith said he called the
retreat to discuss the office's organization at his one-year point in the
prestigious post.
Asked if his staff suffers from a morale problem, he said, "We are an
organization that is under a lot of stress, with people who are working
extremely hard. The issues are big and important and significant, and the
hours are long."
Mr. Feith said that after the retreat, he spoke to the entire policy branch
at the Pentagon. He said he is considering changes. One is flextime, whereby
workers would be assured time for family commitments, such as the Cub
Scouts, or, say, a night at the theater. He also said he will make sure more
feedback reaches policy producers.
The unit tackles a number of weighty issues, such as arms-control
negotiations, military-to-military relations with key allies and
adversaries, and special-operations warfare, a key weapon in the terror war.
Mr. Rumsfeld, a self-described impatient manager, is said to spend much of
his time in the world of policy and new ideas, as opposed to weapons
acquisition or personnel. He looks to Mr. Feith's policy shop daily for
ideas or to respond to his own before he dashes off to a National Security
Council meeting or meets with a foreign defense minister.
His demands come in the form of white-paper memos, which Pentagon employees
call "snowflakes." They can cascade down at any moment. Sometimes there are
tight deadlines, forcing policy-makers to ditch a project to meet the
secretary's demands.
"It's near a crisis in low morale because of Feith's inability to
communicate well with people," said a second employee who was briefed on the
off-site.
Said another policy worker, "Feith is absolutely brilliant. He's
intellectually honest. But he's a lawyer, and lawyers don't always make good
managers." This source said Mr. Feith sometimes loses his temper and yells
at people.
Mr. Feith is one of a handful of Reagan-era Cold Warriors who re-entered
government to transform the military but now have a new war to fight. Like
fellow neoconservatives, Mr. Feith is skeptical of China's intentions,
strongly backs Israel and favors covert or military action against Iraq.
Mr. Feith himself knows what it's like to put in long hours. A prolific
writer, he rises at 4 a.m., works at home a few hours, then arrives at the
office for a 12- to 14-hour day.
He has plenty of defenders, especially among the neoconservative movement,
including his mentor Richard Perle and Deputy Defense Secretary Paul
Wolfowitz.
Managing attorney at the D.C. law firm of Feith &amp; Zell before coming to the
Pentagon, Mr. Feith was a special counsel to Mr. Perle when the Reagan-era
assistant defense secretary was battling the Soviets.
"I think it's the best policy shop the Pentagon has ever had," said Mr.
Perle, who is chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, a group of
outside advisers. "They've been doing creative work on almost every issue.
They've had a tremendous amount to cope with. The whole department has
because of September 11. They've managed to do this despite all the
interesting work they are doing on the Middle East, on Russia, on NATO."
He said Mr. Feith, and Gen. Peter Pace, Joint Chiefs vice chairman, have
special responsibility for the war's daily operations. "It has generated an
endless number of interagency meetings," Mr. Perle said. "They have a lot of
responsibility on a daily basis."
Mr. Feith assumed the job just two months before September 11 and has been
faced with two major challenges: setting policies for transforming the
military - the president's pet project - and for the far-flung war against
terrorists, for which Mr. Rumsfeld is always seeking new approaches.
Mr. Feith's principal deputy undersecretary Stephen Cambone was more Mr.
Rumsfeld's right-hand man than Mr. Feith's. The post has gone unfilled since
Mr. Rumsfeld named Mr. Cambone as director of program analysis and
evaluation.
Said Mr. Feith, "We have a good organization that's working well, and the
conditions are difficult because of the war and the long hours and the quick
pace of the work. We are focused on how we can improve the quality of life
for people who work here, by addressing these problems of long hours." 

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
4 DVDs Free +s&p Join Now
http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/ySSFAA/kgFolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

------------------
http://all.net/ 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 2002-10-01 06:44:32 PDT